Archive for category News

Four Secrets to Having a Spectacular Marriage

What do couples who describe their marriages as spectacular do differently than those who describe their marriages as simply so-so? The differences are quite small, actually. “When we look at happy couples, we see that great marriages are not the result of hours of hard work,” says relationship researcher Terri L. Orbuch, Ph.D., who followed 373 couples for over 22 years as part of a marriage study funded by the National Institutes of Health. “It’s small changes in behavior and attitude that can transform your relationship.” In her new book, 5 Simple Steps to Take Your Marriage from Good to Great, Orbuch shares the steps you can take to marital greatness.



1. Understand Each Other’s Needs

“The main reason marriages break up is not conflict, communication problems, or sexual incompatibility,” Orbuch says. “It’s frustration — the day-to-day disappointment of the gap between what you expect and how your partner acts — that is most damaging.” To diffuse that frustration, share your expectations with each other. Maybe you desire more affection and he craves more relaxed couple time. “And be sure to check in with your partner once a year, as added pressures or life changes can create new expectations,” Orbuch says.



2. Show Him Some Love

Husbands whose wives give them affirmation — those words and gestures that show they are appreciated, respected, and loved — are twice as likely to describe themselves as happily married. And men may need affirmation more than women, Orbuch’s research showed. “Women are constantly receiving flattery from friends and even strangers who say, ‘Love your outfit!’” she says. “But men don’t get that recognition.” Can you imagine a passerby stopping your husband to compliment him on how well his tie matches his shirt? Not gonna happen — which is why men rely on that attention from their wives. Luckily, there’s another payoff to your flattery: He’s more likely to return those loving deeds back to you.

3. Take 10

A weekly date night is always recommended as a way to reconnect, but sometimes all you need is a few minutes. “I call this the 10-Minute Rule: Take 10 minutes a day to talk about anything — except for kids, responsibilities, or chores,” Orbuch says. Throw out Mom’s old advice about how an air of mystery keeps the flame alive: Orbuch’s research showed that 98 percent of happy couples say they intimately understand their partners. And knowing your spouse intimately isn’t always about engaging in heavy conversations: Anything that helps you learn something new will bring you closer, Orbuch says. You can bond over why you think your dog is the smartest one on your block or which superpower you’d want most. You’ll get to know each other’s inner world and strengthen your bond of happiness.



4. Focus on the Good

The best way to make your relationship better is to work at fixing what’s wrong, right? Nope. “The most effective way to boost fun and passion is to add positive elements to your marriage,” Orbuch says. “That positive energy makes us feel good and motivates us to keep going in that direction.” This doesn’t mean that you can’t feel — or talk about — anything negative, but “pretend you are weighing your interactions on a scale,” she says. “If you want a happier relationship, the positive side needs to far outweigh the bad.” The more you honor the love and joy in your bond, the sooner you’ll transform your marriage into one that is truly great.

Couple skipping after drawing a heart in the sand\\'Four Secrets to a Spectacular Marriage'\\Photo: Getty Images, courtesy of Redbook

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Cracked iphone 3G Screen - Advice Please



Cracked  iphone 3G LCD Screen - Advice Please


Ok last night i managed to completely crack my screen. The whole screen/front has cracks all over it. The phone however appears to be working absolutley ok, nake calls, receive calls, total functionality.

Now I bought the phone which is the 3g, last november and i live in spain.

I am quite happy to attempt to repair myself as i have less than no confidence in movistar sending it back to apple

vsvs

and it will probably take 4-6 weeks and quite possibly cost me a couple of hundred euros.

So my questions are:

Anybody here have first hand experience of replacing the front screen? (yes ive watched a couple of the tutorials)

If the phone is working fine, then surely i need only buy the front screen and NOT the digitizer.

Any advice would be great thank you.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

The Real Peace Prize Will Be Elusive

WASHINGTON — From the rooftop of a mud house overlooking the Shomali Plain, the white explosions in the distance and the red streak of artillery fire and the occasional thunderclaps echoing across the valley announced the start of America’s war in Afghanistan.

Skip to next paragraph

dsvdsv

Tyler Hicks/Getty Images, for The New York Times

ON GUARD A member of the Northern Alliance in Salong, Afghanistan, in 2001, clutching a rocket-propelled grenade-launcher.

But for the munitions, it was as dark a night as can be imagined on that cool October evening. We were warned not to use flashlights or light up a cigarette or even let the glow of our satellite phones be seen lest we attract Taliban fire. The only other light in view came from the headlights of a long string of vehicles across the valley ferrying civilians away from the bombing.

That was eight years ago last week and never on that night, as we watched the might of the world’s most powerful nation rain down on the primitive army of soldiers clad in rags and sandals, did it occur to us that America so many years later would still be trying to figure out how to win — or whether it even could. The journey from the rugged village of Topdara to the halls of the White House is a quintessential story about the limits of power and imagination.

That was brought home in stark terms on Friday as President Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize just hours before meeting with advisers in the Situation Room to discuss escalating a war that has yet to be won. The lessons of the last eight years suggest that no matter what choice he makes and no matter what the Nobel committee in Oslo thinks, Mr. Obama may very well leave office after four or eight years and there will still be no peace in Afghanistan.

To cover the war from its opening moments in Afghanistan to this critical juncture in Washington is to try to reconcile a jumble of images and impressions, none of which adds up to the easy answers Mr. Obama wishes he could find. After all, the president came to office in search of a strategy, came up with one, and then six months later decided to cast it aside in search of another one. He seems to be grasping at ideas that have been regurgitated year after year now with limited success. If it were simple, of course, someone would have done it by now.

Perhaps this should have been obvious from the beginning, and in some ways it was. For those of us based in Moscow at the time of the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, the cliché about the ungovernable, unconquerable graveyard of empires was no theoretical abstract but the real life history of a generation of aging Russians. Nonetheless, we set out from Moscow and other points around the globe for the unforgiving terrain of Afghanistan to see if it could be done differently.

An old bucket-of-bolts Soviet helicopter flown by Afghan rebels far above its permitted altitude delivered a few of us from Dushanbe, Tajikistan, over the majestic Hindu Kush into the heart of the Panjshir Valley, the haven of the Northern Alliance fighting the Taliban government in Kabul to the south. Another helicopter had been shot down that day, or so we were told, but we made it safely.

European journalists were there, but it would be days before any other Americans showed up and longer before the C.I.A. arrived, not that we ever saw them. For the uninitiated, it was a biblical scene, a dusty tableau of hardened people living without electricity, running water or even furniture. And scattered in valleys and off the dirt roads were the carcasses of Soviet tanks.

The next eight months spent in Afghanistan and Pakistan would provide all sorts of clues about how intractable a situation the United States had just parachuted into. While America’s war began the night of Oct. 7, 2001, with the bombing north of Kabul, the Afghans had been at war more or less continually for more than two decades by that point.

On one of the first days in the Panjshir Valley, some Afghans took us to meet a Northern Alliance commander at the front in their long standoff with the Taliban. His base was a series of mud buildings with a well and a couple of 81-millimeter mortars surrounded by spent shells.

“You want to hear the Taliban?” he asked us.

He picked up a radio connected by cable to a Japanese car battery and switched frequencies, just a day after lobbing shells at the other side.

“Are all of your friends O.K.?” the rebel commander asked into the radio.

“Yes, all of my friends are O.K.,” the Taliban fighter on the other end answered.

They chatted for a few minutes before signing off. “He was my friend,” the rebel commander explained. “But now he is my enemy.”

The idea of clear lines and neat definitions does not apply in Afghanistan. Over the following few months, many of the themes of the last eight years would become clear. There were civilians killed by errant American bombs and intrigues among Afghans who ostensibly were our allies and common cause forged with a ruthless warlord who did just enough of the Americans’ bidding to stay on the payroll while waging his own private war for control of his local province.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

obama nobel peace prize for what??

Obama Nobel Peace Prize: Obama wins, and partisan fighting continues

President Barack Obama’s winning of the Nobel Peace Prize brought nothing of the sort at home, as political combatants were quick to assume their usual battlements: Democrats largely hailed the decision while Republicans and their allies ridiculed Obama and the Norwegian committee that awarded the prize.

“What has President Obama actually accomplished?” said Michael Steele, chairman of the Republican National Committee. “It is unfortunate that the president’s star power has outshined tireless advocates who made real achievements working toward peace and human rights.”

The Democratic National Committee fired back with a statement comparing Steele’s comments with similar remarks from the Taliban and Hamas.

“Whether it’s celebrating the nation’s loss of the Olympics, or attacking the recognition of American leadership today, Republicans time and again are proving that they’re putting politics ahead of patriotism,” said Hari Sevugan, a Democratic Party spokesman.

Within minutes of the announcement, a scorching debate broke out on TV airwaves, talk radio, the blogosphere and just about anywhere people of opposite political persuasions meet.

Some critics suggested Obama won the award because he is black. “I did not realize the Nobel Peace Prize had an affirmative action quota,” blogger Erick Erickson posted on the conservative Redstate Web site.

Others on the right renewed their criticism of Obama as an apologist for America who, through attempts at conciliation, has weakened the country abroad.

“I’m not sure what the international community loved best,” said Republican Rep. Gresham Barrett, a candidate for governor in South Carolina, “his waffling on Afghanistan, pulling defense missiles out of Eastern Europe, turning his back on freedom fighters in Honduras, coddling Castro, siding with the Palestinians against Israel, or almost getting tough on Iran.”

Some Republicans, however, echoed Democrats in praising Obama’s selection, among them Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger: “The president has consistently shown that he is committed to reaching out to other nations and positioning America to once again be the global leader for peace and prosperity,” Schwarzenegger said in a statement.

Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, who is eyeing a bid for the GOP presidential nomination in 2012, said, “Under any circumstance, an appropriate response is to say, ‘Congratulations.’ ”

Some on the left, meanwhile, joined the chorus of critics, saying the honor was undeserved when Obama is weighing the dispatch of more troops to Afghanistan.

“President Obama needs to prove that he really is a force for peace,” said Kevin Martin, director of the anti-war group Peace Action.

Those supporting the president were quick to condemn the GOP response.

“Bad manners, guys,” Paul Begala, a Democratic strategist and former aide to President Bill Clinton, wrote on CNN’s Web site. “If you pride yourself on being a super-patriot, you really ought to root for America.”

mbarabak@tribune.com

What they had to say

John Bolton, former U.N. ambassador: “The Nobel Committee is preaching at Americans, but they won’t be deceived. … The Nobel Peace Prize should be for achievement, not effort.”

Rush Limbaugh, radio personality: “Obama gives speeches trashing his own country and for that gets a prize, which is now worth as much as whatever prizes they are putting in Cracker Jacks these days.”

– Associated Press

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Henry: Is Obama’s Nobel a blessing or curse?

By Ed Henry

CNN Senior White House Correspondent

eaf
Decrease font Decrease font
Enlarge font Enlarge font



WASHINGTON (CNN) — Yes he can win the Nobel Peace Prize. Even on the same day that President Obama met with his war council yet again to consider sending up to 40,000 more U.S. troops to Afghanistan.



President Obama speaks about his Nobel award at the White House on Friday.


President Obama speaks about his Nobel award at the White House on Friday.

efwe

The confluence of events — some might even call it irony — was a stark reminder that this award was more about the promise of change than actual change. Peace is not at hand in Iraq or Afghanistan, and while the president has articulated a new approach to the world it will be difficult to translate that vision into some actual victories.

“Even as we strive to seek a world in which conflicts are resolved peacefully and prosperity is widely shared, we have to confront the world as we know it today,” Obama said in the White House Rose Garden. “I am the commander in chief of a country that’s responsible for ending a war and working in another theater to confront a ruthless adversary that directly threatens the American people and our allies.”

Let me be clear that I don’t buy into any of this silliness from some pundits about how winning such a prestigious honor could backfire on Obama. Becoming only the fourth U.S. president to ever win the Nobel can hardly be spun into a negative.

But it’s important to note that the award does not create one job in the U.S. economy. It does not provide one Republican vote on Capitol Hill for the president’s health care push. And the challenges are clearly not just on the domestic front.

With the Norwegian Nobel committee citing the president’s “extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples,” one top Obama adviser told me this is an affirmation of the administration’s aggressive efforts to reach out across the world. But this adviser quickly acknowledged the hard work of trying to turn that dialogue into actual progress on difficult problems like forging Israeli-Palestinian peace. Video Watch Obama’s speech on Nobel award »

And I think this award puts new pressure on the president from the right and left. Conservatives like CNN contributor Ed Rollins was quick to charge the honor will only highlight the fact that the president has few achievements to point to yet. “I think certainly you have to give him an ‘A’ for trying,” he said. “But at the end of the day, what has he accomplished?”

I think you can also see liberals like Sen. Russ Feingold, D-Wisconsin, who has been pushing Obama for a timetable to withdraw U.S. troops from Afghanistan being emboldened. Why wouldn’t Feingold now say something to the effect of, “Mr. Peacemaker, why are you potentially further escalating the war in Afghanistan?”

Nevertheless, this is a sweet moment for the president. What’s striking to me is that exactly one week ago I was in Copenhagen, Denmark, where the president swooped in for a few hours to push Chicago’s Olympic bid. Once he lost, the dramatic defeat led many — including me — to report that this was obviously a blow on the international stage.

That’s why when the news about the Nobel Peace Prize landed like a lightning bolt in the wee hours of Friday morning, White House aides were ecstatic. As I rushed to get some reaction, I finally reached Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel by telephone and he was quick with a quip.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Palau pioneers ’shark sanctuary’

By Richard Black

Environment correspondent, BBC News website

xzcxvz


Hammerhead shark

Hammerheads are among hundreds of species found in Palau’s waters


Palau is to create the world’s first “shark sanctuary”, banning all commercial shark fishing in its waters.

The President of the tiny Pacific republic, Johnson Toribiong, will announce the ban during Friday’s session of the UN General Assembly.

With half of the world’s oceanic sharks at risk of extinction, conservationists regard the move as “game-changing”.

It will protect about 600,000 sq km (230,000 sq miles) of ocean, an area about the size of France.

President Toribiong will also call for a global ban on shark-finning, the practice of removing the fins at sea.

cx
cxz The need to protect the sharks outweighs the need to enjoy a bowl of soup fdb
President Johnson Toribiong

Fins are a lucrative commodity on the international market where they are bought for use in shark fin soup.

As many as 100 million sharks are killed each year around the world.

“These creatures are being slaughtered and are perhaps at the brink of extinction unless we take positive action to protect them,” said President Toribiong.

“Their physical beauty and strength, in my opinion, reflects the health of the oceans; they stand out,” he told BBC News from UN headquarters in New York.

Local benefits

A number of developed nations have implemented catch limits and restrictions on finning.

Some developing countries such as The Maldives have also taken measures to protect the creatures; but Palau’s initiative takes things to a new level, according to conservationists close to the project.

“Palau has recognised how important sharks are to healthy marine environments, and they’ve decided to do what no other nation has done and declare their entire Exclusive Economic Zone a shark sanctuary,” said Matt Rand, director of global shark conservation at the Pew Environment Group.

cxz
sd
Bodies without fins

sf

“They are leading the world in shark conservation.”

Mr Rand said that about 130 threatened species of shark frequented waters close to Palau and would be likely to gain from the initiative.

Although the country has only 20,000 inhabitants, its territory encompasses 200 scattered islands, which means that its territorial waters are much bigger than many nations a thousand times more populous.

Economics is clearly an incentive for the Palau government, which derives most of its income from tourism.

Sharks are themselves a big attraction for scuba-divers, and may also play a role in keeping coral reef ecosystems healthy.


Advertisement


Oceanic Whitetips and Scalloped Hammerheads will be safe in Palau’s shark sanctuary. Footage courtesy of Living Ocean Productions


Globally, 21% of shark species whose extinction risk has been assessed fall into the “threatened” categories, and 18% are “near threatened”. For a further 35%, there is not enough data to decide.

Over half of the species that spend most of their time in the upper layers of the ocean, exposed to fishing, are on the threatened list.

Illegal shark-finning is the main cause; but there are legal targeted hunts for fins and meat, and sharks are also caught accidentally on longlines set for fish such as marlin and tuna.

Port side catches

Enforcing the ban will be an issue for Palau, which possesses just one patrol boat capable of monitoring its waters.

A recent aerial survey found fishing 70 vessels in the area, most of them illegally.

But Carl-Gustaf Lundin, who heads the marine programme at the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), said there were other ways of tackling the illegal trade.

vxz vv c
dfvb The time for setting aside tiny areas of sea that only protect a few sedentary species is over fvdsgv
Carl-Gustaf Lundin, IUCN

“For example, the US has been sharing lists of illegal vessels with established fishing companies, so that they can report on their dishonest or non-decent peers,” he said.

“We’re also exploring what options there are for monitoring remotely at low cost.

“And you don’t need to catch people out there in the ocean; everyone needs to land their fish, so as long as you have most nations signed up to oppose illegal fishing, your chances of catching them are pretty decent.”

Dr Lundin noted that earlier this week, another Pacific island state, Kiribati, signed off a collaboration with the US that establishes the largest marine reserve on the planet.

“The time for setting aside tiny areas of sea that only protect a few sedentary species is over; and it (the Palau sanctuary) is important because it shows the way in terms of putting large areas aside.”

Considered position

In organisations such as the International Whaling Commission and the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), Palau has in recent years regularly sided with pro-hunting countries such as Japan.

Map of Palau

Mr Toribiong told BBC News that before going to New York for the UN General Assembly, he had planned to “state to the world that Palau will revisit its current position” on whaling.

But following the recent change of government in Japan, and because of the two countries’ “close relationship”, he said there would now be a bilateral meeting.

“My position is to reconsider our current position in light of the most recent scientific data to ensure that the current position that Palau takes will not lead to the depletion and extinction of whales,” he said.

But when it came to sharks, the president said he was sure that the sanctuary is backed by science - sharks are threatened as a group of species, and sanctuaries can help.

“Not all nations consider shark fins as delicacies,” he said.

“And we feel that the need to protect the sharks outweighs the need to enjoy a bowl of soup.”

Asked what he would be urging other leaders to do in his UN speech, he said simply: “To follow suit.”

Richard.Black-INTERNET@bbc.co.uk

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Emerging economies get new role

Emerging economies get new role


Barack Obama, Nicolas Sarkozy, Carla Bruni and Michelle Obama

The Obamas welcomed world leaders to Pittsburgh


The G20 group of leading and emerging economies is to take on a new role as a permanent body co-ordinating the world economy, a White House statement said.

It will take on the role previously carried out by the developed powerhouses of the G8 group.

The G20 is meeting in the US city of Pittsburgh for a two-day summit.

EU officials also announced a deal to shift the balance of voting in the International Monetary Fund (IMF) towards growing nations such as China.

Currently, China wields 3.7% of IMF votes compared with France’s 4.9%, although the Chinese economy is now 50% larger than that of France.

dvs
WHAT IS THE G20?
Set up after the Asian financial crisis in 1999 as a forum for finance ministers and central bankers
First G20 leaders summit in 2008 to discuss response to economic crisis
Members are: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, EU, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, South Korea, Turkey, UK, USA
Members are joined by Spain, Netherlands, International Monetary Fund and World Trade Organisation
svv

BBC business editor Robert Peston said that the rich nations of North America and Europe formally acknowledging that they no longer have a monopoly of wisdom on what’s good for the global economy would be the most important thing to come out of this summit.

The IMF has 186 member-states. It lends money to countries that are facing problems, but in return economic changes have to be made by those countries.

The IMF has been criticised in the past as being a group of developed countries trying to lay down the law to struggling, developing countries, which is why the decision to give growing nations more votes is important.

Reports also suggest that the US is seeking a reduction in the number of seats on the IMF board from 24 to 20, which could mean the UK and France lose their seats.

‘Years of low growth’

Near the venue, police fired rubber bullets at protesters on a march. The previous G20 meeting, in London in April, was also marred by clashes.

The disturbances are thought to have begun after hundreds of protesters tried to march, without permission, towards the convention centre where the summit is being held.


Advertisement


Police used pepper spray to disperse hundreds of protesters


UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown stressed the importance of co-operation and action at the summit.

“Without concerted action there is a danger of years of low growth and low employment,” he told Sky News.

A White House statement announced the new role for the G20.

“The G20 leaders reached a historic agreement to put the G20 at the center of their efforts to work together to build a durable recovery while avoiding the financial fragilities that led to the crisis,” it said.

vdsfb
G20 BLOGS
Robert Peston
svds It is endeavouring to patch up the failed framework of banking regulation rather than going for more fundamental and radical change vdsv

Mark Mardell

sd The US had until now appeared to want to leave this politically tricky proposal [on bonuses] on the back burner svd

“Today, leaders endorsed the G20 as the premier forum for their international economic cooperation.”

US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said G20 countries had reached a consensus on the “basic outline” of a proposal to limit pay and bonuses by the end of 2009.

Each country would set their own standards, he said, but that these would be overseen by the G20’s Financial Stability Board - made up of central bankers and regulators.

But there are G20 members that would like to see the agreement going further.

German Finance Minister Peer Steinbrueck wrote in the Financial Times that a “global financial-transaction tax” of about 0.05% should be introduced.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Woman, 107, On Husband No. 22 But Ready To Marry Again!

(CNN) — Afraid that her husband will leave her for a younger woman, a 107-year-old Malaysian woman is looking to marry again — for the 23rd time.



fdasgz


Wok Kundor: “I am an aged woman. I don’t have the body nor am I a young woman who can attract anyone.”

erafg

Wok Kundor has been happily married for four years to her husband, a man 70 years her junior.

But since he left their village in northern Terengganu state for a drug rehabilitation program in the capital, Kuala Lumpur, Wok has had a gnawing feeling.

“She said that she has been feeling insecure lately and she needs to find out whether he still loves her or not,” said R.S.N. Murali, a reporter for The Star. The English-language Malaysian daily was among several local media outlets reporting on the lifelong romantic.

“She is worried he might not come back after his program and find himself a younger wife,” Murali said.

If so, Wok has her eyes set on a 50-year-old man, but hopes it does not come to that.

“I realize that I am an aged woman. I don’t have the body nor am I a young woman who can attract anyone,” she told the newspaper.

“My intention to remarry is to fill my forlornness,” particularly during the Muslim month of fasting, Ramadan, she said.

Malaysian media, which has previously reported on the woman, said Wok has been married 22 times. That would make her marriages last an average of four years.

Wok would not discuss past relationships, Murali said.

“Some of her better halves have passed away or have divorced, but she doesn’t want to talk about them or her children,” he said.

Wok and her current husband, Mohammed Boor Che Musa, hail from the same village and met there.

Muhammad, 37, was quoted in an earlier report as saying the couple fell for each other because it was “God’s will.”

On Monday, he told The Star that he is still very much in love with his wife and cannot dream of life with someone else.

But Wok wants to hear him say it, Murali said.

Soon, the centenarian plans to make the journey to Kuala Lumpur — if she can find a neighbor to drive her

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

T-Mobile and Orange in UK merger

T-Mobile and Orange in UK merger


ADGD

If completed, shop closures and job losses are seen as inevitable


T-Mobile and Orange plan to merge their UK businesses, creating a mobile phone giant with 28.4 million customers.

If completed, a deal between Deutsche Telekom’s T-Mobile and Orange owner France Telecom would see a firm with sales of 9.4bn euros (£8.2bn; $13.5bn).

Holding about 37% of the mobile market it would be the UK’s largest provider, overtaking Telefonica’s O2.

It is the second large corporate action in two days, after Kraft Food’s £10.2bn takeover proposal for Cadbury.

Orange and T-Mobile said their deal - due to be signed by November - would “bring substantial benefits to UK customers”, and promised expanded network coverage, better network quality and improved customer services.

However it is likely that competition authorities in the UK and EU will probe the deal.

‘Efficiencies’

Both brands would remain separate for the first 18 months after the deal is completed while branding is reviewed.

GAERRGARE
ANALYSIS
Simon Atkinson, Business reporter, BBC News

This deal - if it goes ahead - will shake up the UK mobile market.

Both brands would stay for a while - but the Orange name is tipped to remain long-term.

Being market leader would give it clout when it came to the handsets available. Neither Orange or T-Mobile offer “must have” phones such as the iPhone and Blackberry Storm - but this could change.

And the firms promise customers will get better network coverage - and there’s potential for investing in better, faster 3G networks and data access through mobiles.

But not everyone will be happy. The range of tariffs offered by the two companies is likely to be scaled back.

Meanwhile, just three major players in the UK mobile market would mean less consumer choice.

Which? surveys suggest Orange and T-Mobile have worse customer service than their rivals - and meshing company databases together will bring another challenge.


Orange chief executive Tom Alexander would lead the new company, with T-Mobile’s UK boss Richard Moat as chief operating officer.

Orange employs 12,500 people in the UK, while T-Mobile has UK workforce of 6,500.

A spokeswoman confirmed there would be “efficiencies” that could be made across both businesses - but said it was too early to give details of any impact on staff.

Integrating the businesses would cost between £600m and £800m, the firms said. This bill would include decommissioning mobile phone masts, cutting back the network of stores and streamlining other operations. Over time, savings should reach about £3.5bn, they added.

Mobile phone analyst Nigel Hawkins told the BBC that it was not unprecedented for a firm to have more than a third of a European country’s mobile phone market.

“Over the next few weeks and months there will inevitably be some negotiation with regulators, and we could see some concessions from the operators,” he added.

“If the deal goes ahead, then this merged firm, along with O2 and Vodafone will have more than 90% of the UK market and there will be concern that there remains plenty of competition and that this position is not abused.”

Avoiding writedowns

Deutsche Telekom said earlier this year that it was considering its options for its UK business - which has struggled to win customers in the highly competitive market - which sees five operators and several smaller players compete.

FADGF
DEAL IN NUMBERS
28.4m customers
37% UK market share
£8.2bn sales (in 2008)
Source: Deutsche Telekom

Observers say that a joint venture would allow the German firm to avoid the write downs it could face if forced to sell T-Mobile UK for less than it hoped.

Meanwhile, for France Telecom, the deal is a way to strengthen its position in the UK market without paying cash or taking on vastly more debt.

T-Mobile is currently the fourth-largest mobile operator in the UK, with a 15% share of the market. O2 has a 27% share, followed by Vodafone (25%) and Orange (22%).

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

General Motors files for bankruptcy protection U.S.-led restructuring is the largest industrial bankruptcy in U.S. history

Image: GM Spring Hill Manufacturing Plant

Bill Waugh / AP file
Melvin Matthews, right, uses a large robotic machine to install front seats in a new 2009 Chevrolet Traverse at the GM Spring Hill Manufacturing Plant, in Spring Hill, Tenn. GM will permanently close nine more plants and idle three others to trim production and labor costs under bankruptcy protection.
BREAKING NEWS
msnbc.com news services
updated 10:37 a.m. ET June 1, 2009

WASHINGTON - General Motors filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection Monday as part of the Obama administration’s plan to shrink the automaker to a sustainable size and give a majority ownership stake to the federal government.

GM’s bankruptcy filing is the fourth-largest in U.S. history and the largest for an industrial company. The company said it has $172.81 billion in debt and $82.29 billion in assets.

As part of its restructuring, GM said it will permanently close nine more plants and idle three others to trim production and labor costs under bankruptcy protection.

Assembly plants in Pontiac, Mich., and Wilmington, Del., will close this year, while plants in Spring Hill, Tenn., and Orion, Mich., will shut down production but remain on standby. Powertrain plants in Livonia, Flint and Ypsilanti Township, Mich. will close next year, along with plants in Parma, Ohio, and Fredericksburg, Va.

Stamping plants in Indianapolis and Mansfield, Ohio, also will close. A stamping plant in Pontiac, Mich., will be idled but remain in a standby capacity. GM also said it will close service and parts warehouses in Boston, Jacksonville, Fla., and Columbus, Ohio, by the end of this year.

As it reorganizes, the fallen icon of American industrial might will rely on $30 billion of additional financial assistance from the Treasury Department and $9.5 billion from Canada. That’s on top of about $20 billion in taxpayer money GM already has received in the form of low-interest loans.

GM will follow a similar course taken by smaller rival Chrysler LLC, which filed for Chapter 11 protection in April. A judge gave Chrysler approval to sell most of its assets to Italy’s Fiat, moving the U.S. automaker closer to a quick exit from court protection, possibly this week.

President Barack Obama said Monday that a court’s approval of the sale of Chrysler’s assets to Fiat will allow the automaker to emerge stronger from bankruptcy. He said in a statement that the decision “paves the way for the new Chrysler to successfully emerge from bankruptcy as a new, stronger, more competitive company for the future.”

The plan is for the federal government to take a 60 percent ownership stake in the new GM. The Canadian government would take 12.5 percent, with the United Auto Workers getting a 17.5 percent share and unsecured bondholders receiving 10 percent. Existing GM shareholders are expected to be wiped out.

The administration expects the new GM could emerge from bankruptcy in as little as 60 to 90 days.

President Barack Obama is scheduled to address the nation about GM’s future at midday from Washington, and GM CEO Fritz Henderson is to follow him with a news conference in New York.

GM’s filing comes 32 days after a Chapter 11 filing by Chrysler, which also was hobbled by plunging sales of cars and trucks as the worst recession since the Great Depression intensified.

The third of the one-time Big Three, Ford Motor Co., has also been stung hard by the sales slump, but it avoided bankruptcy by mortgaging all of its assets in 2006 to borrow roughly $25 billion, giving it a financial cushion GM and Chrysler lacked.

The downsized GM’s brands will be limited to Chevrolet, Cadillac, GMC and Buick. Its Pontiac, Saturn, Hummer and Saab operations will be either sold or closed. GM said it was finalizing a deal to sell Hummer, and plans for Saturn are expected to be announced within weeks.

GM, whose headquarters tower over downtown Detroit, said it believed the filing was not an acknowledgment of failure, but a necessary way to cleanse itself in an orderly fashion of problems and costs that have dogged it for decades.

Trading of GM shares was halted early Monday after they plunged Friday as low as 74 cents, the lowest price in the company’s 100-year history. GM will be kicked out of the Dow Jones industrial average because rules established by the News Corp. unit that oversees the index prohibit it from including companies that have filed for bankruptcy.

GM first sought help from the Bush administration and Congress last year as it was in the midst of being staggered by $30.9 billion in losses and seeing its cash resources shrink by more than $19 billion.

Consumers, worried about the economy and the future of GM, shied away from the company’s cars and trucks this year even after President George W. Bush promised loans and Obama followed through with billions more in assistance — plus a stiff set of new requirements GM was ordered to meet.

When GM failed to do so by a March 31 deadline, Obama forced out CEO Rick Wagoner and replaced him with Henderson.

More on this story

Wagoner served at the helm since 2000 and was the face of GM when he first flew on the company jet to ask Congress for aid. After a firestorm of negative publicity, Wagoner rode in a hybrid Chevrolet Malibu from Detroit to Washington for a second set of withering questions before lawmakers.

But that amounted to only a sideshow as the automaker’s financial position worsened. Its revenues plunged almost 50 percent in the quarter ended March 30 and it racked up another $6 billion in losses.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments